Scribble Hub Forum

A third hand? Exciting.

A man already has a third hand.

Oh. A fourth hand? Exciting.

What is the third hand?

Tell.

Me.

As I bathe in your embarrasment.

Male Genitalia.

What? Ew, no. It's your tongue.

Then you don't single out men as having a third arm. Women have tongues too. Are you saying that women shouldn't have a voice in our society? How sexist.

Actually, @CadmarLegend don't you mean a third leg?

@Napelynn Male Genitalia.

Click to expand...

Well, you can directly say penis or phallus. It still sounds gentlecatly.

Then you don't single out men as having a third arm. Women have tongues too. Are you saying that women shouldn't have a voice in our society? How sexist.

Click to expand...

Click to expand...

Oh, really? Did I specifically say that JUST men had a third leg? No. I never said that. What you pointed out is equivalent to saying that a man at a gym where everyone is buff is muscular.

Now, going by your logic, because I singled ONE man out of the gym, no other people are muscular. How... something-ist is that?!

If you single out one person at the gym and say they are muscular, you are implying that they are more muscular than everyone else, not that everyone else isn’t muscular. I understand that. However, that kind of logic doesn’t work on third hands. Because you either have one or you don’t. By singling out men, you were implying that women don’t have a third arm.

no. look over it again. then tell me how it singles out the women and say that they have no third hand.

A man already has a third hand.

Click to expand...

“A man”

You should have just said “You already have a third arm” not “A man already has a third arm”

And it’s not singling out women and saying they don’t have a third arm. It’s singling out men and saying they have a third arm which implies that women don’t.

I am only singling ONE man, yet you say I am sexist!

You weren’t singling out one man as you said “a man” not one specific person.

a man.... is that plural or singular?