Be sure you are not multiplying the denominator by 100. (My computer PEMDAS is making me paranoid.)
Otherwise looks correct.
Otherwise looks correct.
Scribble Hub Forum
NotaNuffian
@Prince_Azmiran_Myrian lol I just got slight lazy as I typed.
@Generic.Archdemon had to check because the head engineer insisted that I had done it wrong somewhere as the figure supposed to show not more than 1% increase.
@Generic.Archdemon had to check because the head engineer insisted that I had done it wrong somewhere as the figure supposed to show not more than 1% increase.
Prince_Azmiran_Myrian
Maybe they don't want it in percent? In that case don't multiply by 100???
Aaqil
If they don't want it in percent, how in the world are you supposed to show the thing hasn't increased by less than 1%!? 
Prince_Azmiran_Myrian
Maybe they want something like this??
NotaNuffian
Wtf is n?
NotaNuffian
Am a mech engineer, not finance engr
NotaNuffian
*technically a simulation engr, cuz the department don't want me but at the same time, I am not worth firing.
Prince_Azmiran_Myrian
Maybe it's a misunderstanding.
Original value/ old = 120
new value / 130
((130-120)/120 )*100 =8.33% growth