Lore and Luoir's lack of effort in their vote vs GoodPerson and Nifty's effort. Nice dichotomy.
That's a big MIGHT.If I give GoodPerson the tentative townlean for making the effort before voting, then it boils down to Nifty and Luoir. If we lynch Luoir for memeing and they end up NOT being mafia, and Nifty lives to D2... maybe Nifty is mafia.
That's a big MIGHT.
people sleep during night, keep all comments for day 2
Look, me have stuff to do.Instead of voting "No elim" if you guys just talked more in the past 47+ hours...
Okeh.people sleep during night, keep all comments for day 2
Why are the remaining people from this post? Ah, very intelligent mafia.If I give GoodPerson the tentative townlean for making the effort before voting, then it boils down to Nifty and Luoir. If we lynch Luoir for memeing and they end up NOT being mafia, and Nifty lives to D2... maybe Nifty is mafia.
Wavering on my Nifty sus. If Nifty explains why they found me opportunistic, I can further solidify my understanding. (Atm, I think they misunderstood my reason for my GoodPerson vote.)GoodPerson- I think he is currently fine for the reasons mentioned above.
Lore- Being blatantly willing to claim to follow (sheep) someone's (FBI's in this case) opinion doesn't give the more cautions feeling I would expect mafia to have, and it's bad for brownie points too so even if mafia is confident, I would expect them to take those by giving their own reasonings. So towny.
LouirM- No idea for now. Nothing clicks as townie of mafia-esque as of now.
FBI- Switching the vote onto GoodPerson felt opportunistic. Although GoodPerson can switch to FBI and elim her, it would be a good reason to further push GoodPerson into a fire pit if he really took that action.
Counterproductive since psychologically wise the cake eater would try to be active to avoid suspicion. And from my experiences catching them cakes, you are very much sus right nowLore and Luoir's lack of effort in their vote vs GoodPerson and Nifty's effort. Nice dichotomy.